You are leaving bbrown.com.
By accessing this link, you will be leaving Brown & Brown’s website and entering a site hosted by another party. Please be advised that you will no longer be subject to the privacy and security policies of Brown & Brown’s website. We encourage you to read and evaluate the privacy and security policies of the site you are entering, which may be different than those of Brown & Brown.
When planning a construction project, a robust insurance strategy is vital for managing risk. Do you rely on individual contractor policies, a comprehensive wrap-up program or some other approach? Understanding your options is the first step for safeguarding your construction investment.
Keep in mind that with any approach, your builder's risk insurance is a separate, stand-alone policy that covers physical damage to the in-progress structure and building materials/equipment stored onsite.
The options below address the liability exposures for those working on the project. The specialists at Brown & Brown can work with you to look at the pros and cons of these approaches for your specific project.
You can structure your insurance in a few ways. Each method offers different levels of control, cost-effectiveness, and administrative responsibility.
When selecting an insurance approach, consider your project's size, complexity, and your desired level of control. Thinking through these factors early in the planning process allows you to build insurance requirements directly into your contracts.
For smaller projects with just a few contractors, a traditional approach can be the most straightforward and cost-effective solution. The owner faces no direct administrative work, as each party is responsible for its own insurance. However, this method can create uneven coverage across the project. Verifying that every subcontractor maintains adequate and continuous coverage can be challenging, potentially leaving you exposed if a policy lapses.
A CCIP is often used for larger construction projects where the general contractor has significant experience managing insurance programs. This approach creates cost certainty for the owner and places insurance decisions in the hands of the party most familiar with the construction process. While this streamlines administration for the owner, it also means you have less direct input into coverage decisions and must rely on the contractor to protect your financial interests.
An OCIP is for large, complex construction projects with numerous subcontractors and specific risk management needs. This wrap-up program lets you, the project owner, shape the coverage, set the terms and manage the overall insurance strategy. An OCIP helps enforce uniform safety procedures, enables broader coverage with higher dedicated limits and reduces the potential for lawsuits between project partners. While it requires more administrative involvement from the owner, it provides the greatest level of control and alignment.
For smaller projects with just a few contractors, a traditional approach can be the most straightforward and cost-effective solution. The owner faces no direct administrative work, as each party is responsible for its own insurance. However, this method can create uneven coverage across the project. Verifying that every subcontractor maintains adequate and continuous coverage can be challenging, potentially leaving you exposed if a policy lapses.
A CCIP is often used for larger construction projects where the general contractor has significant experience managing insurance programs. This approach creates cost certainty for the owner and places insurance decisions in the hands of the party most familiar with the construction process. While this streamlines administration for the owner, it also means you have less direct input into coverage decisions and must rely on the contractor to protect your financial interests.
An OCIP is for large, complex construction projects with numerous subcontractors and specific risk management needs. This wrap-up program lets you, the project owner, shape the coverage, set the terms and manage the overall insurance strategy. An OCIP helps enforce uniform safety procedures, enables broader coverage with higher dedicated limits and reduces the potential for lawsuits between project partners. While it requires more administrative involvement from the owner, it provides the greatest level of control and alignment.
Wrap-up programs like an OCIP or CCIP are typically best for large-scale projects, such as commercial buildings, infrastructure developments or extensive residential complexes. The significant project cost and number of subcontractors on these jobs make centralized insurance more efficient and cost-effective.
A wrap-up program usually bundles key liability coverages into one package. This commonly includes general liability, excess or umbrella liability and workers' compensation for all enrolled participants on the jobsite.
When a subcontractor enrolls in a wrap-up program, their own liability policies do not apply to the work performed on that specific project. Instead, the wrap-up program's coverage takes precedence, and the cost of the subcontractor’s insurance for that job is typically deducted from their bid.
A deductible is the amount paid out-of-pocket before insurance coverage kicks in. In a wrap-up program, the responsibility for paying the deductible is defined in the program documents and can vary. It often falls to the program sponsor (the owner in an OCIP or contractor in a CCIP) or the specific contractor involved in the claim.
Wrap-up programs promote a unified approach to safety by establishing consistent risk management and loss control standards for every contractor on site. A central administrator oversees safety protocols, leading to fewer incidents and better claims outcomes.
Coverage for incidents that occur after construction is finished is a key feature of wrap-up programs. This 'completed operations' coverage typically extends for a set number of years, matching the local statute of repose to protect against liability claims that may arise long after the project is done.
While not generally required by a specific law, many public entities and private lenders mandate the use of a wrap-up program for large-scale projects. This requirement ensures the project has adequate, uniform, and continuous coverage.
In most mandatory wrap-up programs, subcontractors cannot opt out if they wish to work on the project. Failure to enroll can result in the subcontractor being unable to begin work, creating unplanned liability for the project sponsor and potential project delays.
Data is vital for monitoring program performance, identifying safety trends, and managing claims effectively. By analyzing data on incidents and losses, program administrators can implement targeted safety initiatives to reduce risks and control the overall cost of the insurance program. Brown & Brown can help you with in-depth analytics.
Brown & Brown can help you design a construction insurance strategy that aligns with your goals. Whether you need guidance on traditional insurance, OCIPs or CCIPs, our specialists offer tailored solutions to help manage risk and control costs from project start to completion. Connect with us today to discuss your coverage options.