Retirement Readiness: What Plan Sponsors Can Evaluate Beyond Participation

For years, retirement plan committees and other plan decision-makers have focused on the traditional pillars of retirement plan oversight: investment performance, fee benchmarking, regulatory compliance, and service provider evaluations. Those responsibilities remain essential. At the same time, many organizations are asking an additional question: Are participants making meaningful progress toward retirement readiness? While retirement plans cannot guarantee retirement success, they are designed to help employees prepare financially for retirement.

Evaluating retirement readiness in plan oversight

Retirement plans have made significant progress over the past two decades, yet many workers continue to face challenges in accumulating adequate retirement savings. These observations create an important discussion point for retirement plan committees and plan sponsors. A plan may operate efficiently from an administrative perspective while many participants still face challenges achieving their long-term retirement objectives.

Evaluating participant outcomes

ERISA does not require fiduciaries to guarantee successful participant outcomes, nor does it impose a specific obligation to ensure participants achieve retirement readiness. However, plan sponsors are generally expected to act prudently and in the best interests of participants when carrying out their responsibilities. As part of that process, many organizations evaluate whether plan features, investment options, education resources, and service provider capabilities effectively support participants’ long-term savings efforts.

Understanding the role of plan design

Participant outcomes are often influenced by plan design decisions. Features such as automatic enrollment, automatic escalation, employer matching contributions, eligibility provisions, and investment defaults can significantly affect participant behavior and long-term savings accumulation.

Research continues to show that employees are more likely to participate, contribute at meaningful levels, and remain invested when thoughtful plan design features are incorporated into the retirement program. Reviewing how participants interact with existing plan provisions can help organizations evaluate whether the plan is encouraging behaviors that support retirement preparedness.

Settlor and fiduciary considerations

When discussing retirement readiness, it is important to distinguish between settlor decisions and fiduciary responsibilities. Decisions regarding whether to establish a retirement plan, modify plan provisions, add automatic features, or change employer contribution formulas are generally considered business decisions made by the employer acting in a settlor capacity.

Once those decisions have been implemented, plan fiduciaries are generally responsible for overseeing plan administration and exercising discretion in accordance with the plan's terms and applicable regulations. Understanding this distinction can help retirement committees evaluate participant outcomes without confusing fiduciary obligations with business decisions regarding plan design.

Helping participants turn savings into income

As more employees approach retirement, many organizations are expanding their focus beyond accumulation and considering how participants will convert savings into retirement income.

Areas of increasing interest include retirement income projections, lifetime income disclosures, pre-retirement education programs, distribution flexibility, and in-plan retirement income solutions. These tools can help participants better understand how accumulated savings may translate into sustainable retirement income throughout retirement.

Questions for an annual review

Organizations that want a more comprehensive view of retirement plan effectiveness may benefit from incorporating retirement readiness discussions into their annual plan review process.

Questions to consider include:

• Are participants contributing at levels that align with retirement goals?
• How do retirement readiness measures compare across employee groups?
• Are existing plan design features helping drive positive participant outcomes?
• What educational resources are available to support retirement income planning?
• Have participant behaviors changed over time?

These discussions can provide valuable context when evaluating how the retirement plan supports the organization's broader workforce and benefits objectives.

Connecting plan oversight to participant progress

Retirement readiness is not a fiduciary requirement, nor can any employer guarantee that participants will achieve specific retirement outcomes. However, understanding participant preparedness can provide useful context for evaluating the overall effectiveness of a retirement program.

By reviewing participant behavior, plan design, and retirement readiness trends together, organizations can gain a more complete picture of how their retirement plans are helping employees prepare for the future.

Final thoughts

The most successful retirement plans today are not defined solely by strong investment menus or competitive fees. They are measured by whether employees are progressing toward financial security in retirement.

For plan sponsors, retirement readiness is becoming an increasingly important metric of plan success.

By evaluating participant outcomes, leveraging plan design improvements, utilizing retirement readiness analytics, and preparing for the growing focus on retirement income, plan sponsors can help employees move beyond simply saving for retirement and toward achieving it.

Brown & Brown Retirement Plan Services works with plan sponsors to help evaluate service providers, improve participant outcomes, and support fiduciary best practices. If you would like to better understand the capabilities available within your current retirement plan structure, our team can help identify opportunities to maximize the value of your existing network.

To receive valuable insight and plan design alternatives that may improve outcomes for your organization, please contact a Brown & Brown Retirement Plan Services teammate.

The content is developed from sources believed to provide accurate information. The information in this material is not intended as tax or legal advice. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation. The opinions expressed and material provided are for general information and should not be considered a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Securities and investment advisory services offered through Osaic Wealth, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Osaic Wealth is separately owned and other entities and/or marketing names, products or services referenced here are independent of Osaic Wealth. Osaic Form CRS. This communication is strictly intended for individuals residing in the states of: AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, IL, IN, IA, KS, LA, MD, MA, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NY, NC, OH, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, WY, DC. No offers may be made or accepted from any resident outside the specific states referenced.